Ok let's settle this argument simple.

Tonight, I'll ask my Christian Science friend to talk to Jesus, and ask him the 
following:

"Jesus, if EL really DOES decrease performance significantly, and should not be used 
at all, please give me absolutely NO sign.  However, if EL is a great thing and should 
be used by everyone, please give me a sign".

I'll report to you in the morning and let you know what was God's opinion on that.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SANTOS, DANIEL (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 4:02 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: I've officially decided that JSTL is one of the worstthingsto
> ever happen
> 
> > >
> > > If this is the case then I ask you why Java has been the number one
> > > programming language for 4 years now?
> >     Source of this statistic?
> >
> 
> I assumed that this was fairly common knowledge.  I remember when it
> surpassed C++ in Febuary of 2000 (I thought at the time in development
> hours).  Having been a Java programmer since 1997, this was a pretty big
> deal for me.  I even remembered the month/year it happened (which made it
> easire for me to find this report).  So here is the original report, a
> Bloor Research study from Febuary of 2000.  It even has a cute little
> graph that plots the various languages-- http://www.bloor-
> research.com/research_library.php?pid=282
> 
> Now that I look back at it I see that this is when the *demand* for java
> skills surpassed that of C++ skills.  It looks like it was just March of
> last year
> (http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/media/presskits/edge2003/factsheet.pdf) that
> that Java actually surpassed C++ in development hours.  This was of course
> the eventual outcome of it's demand surpassing all other skills.  The data
> from this Sun press release is from the Gartner Group BTW.
> 
> Java is King, there are really no "if"s, "and"s or "butt"s about it.
> 
> As to your performance issues, I don't have them so I can only sugest that
> you can examine your environement, your compiler options (are you using
> hotspot?) and your getters.  All of my bottlenecks are in my DB calls.  I
> have done performance analysis and never came up in my EL.  As I sugested
> earlier, maybe you can run hprof and see where the bottleneck really is?
> 
> Also, I considered myself a fairly hardcode C++ developer (having done it
> from '95 to 2002).  If I am ever in a situation where my memory usage is
> critical, I'm almost certainly in C or C++.  If performance is important,
> I consider C or C++.  But IPC, threading, and networking is so
> phenominally better on Java not to mention the benefits of garbage
> collection and all of it's other features that I am hard pressed to leave
> it or go JNI.  I did need JNI recently for some file system stuff that I
> wanted tweaked (traversing file systems with 100s of thousands of files).
> 
> Daniel
> 
> > > As was recognized long ago,
> > > performance is not everything.  And in fact, means little
> > when you can't
> > > get your product out the door because you are still trying
> > to chase down
> > > memory leaks, buffer overruns and corrupted pointers.
> >
> >     When performance dependes on whether you use <%=hello%>
> > or ${hello}, I'll stick with the first one, considering that
> > it boosts performance up by like 5 times.
> >
> > >  As somebody else
> > > said, C++ programmers will understand this.
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Eric VERGNAUD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 11:33 AM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: Re: I've officially decided that JSTL is one of
> > the worstthingsto
> > > ever happen
> > >
> > >
> > > le 4/07/04 14:27, SH Solutions Ð [EMAIL PROTECTED] a Ðcrit :
> > >
> > > > Right now, I would say that java applications (if well
> > written) are at
> > > least
> > > > half as fast as c applications (also well written).
> > >
> > > Which means that when your java app is in competition with
> > a native app,
> > > youve lost the market.
> > >
> > > -------------------------------
> > > Eric VERGNAUD - JLynx Software
> > > Cutting-edge technologies and
> > > services for software companies
> > > web: http://www.jlynx.com
> > > -------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > > Version: 6.0.716 / Virus Database: 472 - Release Date: 05.07.2004
> > >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.716 / Virus Database: 472 - Release Date: 05.07.2004
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.716 / Virus Database: 472 - Release Date: 05.07.2004
> 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.716 / Virus Database: 472 - Release Date: 05.07.2004
 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to