On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Brett Nash wrote: > > Does anyone have more thoughts on this? Or is this proposal acceptable? > > Doesn't quite seem the right place to put it in general, but I'm not > implementing a server.. > > > Nash, you had some objections? > > Not really anymore. I still think it is a client issue as there are > too many implicit things that the client needs to use. Since most > clients need to be internationalised separately anyway. > > I also tend to think internationalisation is a red herring, unless you > intend to internationalise messages between players...
I think that is a valid issue. My thoughts is to perhaps reserve some space in the Feature set for it, but not require it yet. Clients should be internationalised, no doubt. The Rulesets and the servers can follow later if it should become an issue. There is nothing stopping people from created translated versions of Minisec, etc. (Or better would be to internationalise the rulesets and have the env for the server determine what language to use). Does this sound alright? I know in future we will need to do something, but at this stage it seems a bit premature. More useful would be research and diplomacy support. > Regards, > nash Later Lee
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ tp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel
