Thanks Leandro for the links and detailed reply. I must confess I don't know much about TBX, toolkit has a storage class the supports it and Pootle can open TBX files. at the moment you can use TBX files for the server wide terminology, just delete the default terminology project and recreate it choosing TBX format instead of PO.
But I doubt we support all the fancy features. Friedel and Dwayne probably know more about this. now supporting features like grouping concepts is not just about being able to read the TBX format. the terminology matching algorithms needs to change, and maybe also the UI for presenting terminology suggestions. that's what we'll need to work on before we can start defaulting to TBX for terminology extraction. now as you seem to not only know what advanced terminology support should look like but are also passionate about it, I hope we can convince you to write detailed description of the features you think we should support either on the wiki http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/ or as feature request in bugzilla http://bugs.locamotion.org/ Our goals for Pootle 2.1 are limited to integrating poterminology for extraction. a simple UI for adding/editing/deleting terms and reducing false positives generated by poterminology. But we'll continue to improve terminology support in later versions (this disucssion is relevant to virtaal and toolkit not just Pootle). cheers, Alaa ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Translate-pootle mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
