The Article Addresses Palm recent statement on the hack. "While we appreciate the effort the webOS community has put forth to try and help us along that path, the use of this application is neither endorsed nor recommended by Palm and will likely result in a voided warranty." - Palm
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Patrick - Sprint Repair Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 1:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Treo] 800MHz patch for Pre Theres an article on engadget where Palm is addressing the patch and basically telling people it will void warranty. I have a Pre for work, but its not a primary phone so as much as I want to try the patch, I wont. I have a BB, WM, iPhone and then the Pre. _____________________________________ Blackberry PIN 216AB19A Blackberry, Treo, Windows Mobile, iPhone Repair Motorola 2-Way Radio Service and Technical Consulting _____ From: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of [email protected] <mailto:edward.fultz%40comcast.net> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 1:10 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: [Treo] 800MHz patch for Pre So, I am seeing many people say how much faster the Pre is which update. So why isn't Palm embracing this? I am concerned putting this in place if it is not supported as if anything happens to my phone I don't want the insurance invalidated because I did this unsupported update. Edward Fultz edward.fultz@ <mailto:edward.fultz%40comcast.net> comcast.net (978) 807-4225 ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Messeder" <jmesse...@comcast. <mailto:jmesseder%40comcast.net> net> To: t...@yahoogroups. <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:00:33 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [Treo] 800MHz patch for Pre I think the instructions for the Pre specifically said No to the Pixi. In fact, I'm pretty sure it went so far as to say you'd brick the thing if you try. On 3/29/2010 10:34 AM, ldouglas wrote: > does this (or a similar) patch work with the Pixi? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
