I'm not the one making inaccurate statements. I NEVER said I was against
libreboot's existence. I just think it's time has come and gone and you could
be working on something that will be more useful than libreboot will be in
the coming years. If we have other bootloaders that work perfectly fine
(unlike with X86) then we don't need libreboot any more (because X86 is
dead).
I was merely suggesting that you focus on something that actually will move
things forward rather than focusing on a project that will have no useful
purposes in the near future. X86 is dead. Libreboot is good for X86. I don't
agree that it's good for other architectures. It's fine if that is what you
want to work on. Go ahead and work on it. It won't change my opinion of its
usefulness though. Ultimately I just think your better off working on some
other project at this point rather than try and keep a dying project alive.
I'm aware that the FSF is 'deeply' involved in coreboot/libreboot. That
doesn't change anything. I'm glad Ward and others have worked on it. The FSF
has been involved *for years*. What is happening now and what was the case
years ago are different. You need to distinguish between the two.
If there is a good reason to continue libreboot I'm all ears. However I
haven't heard a really great argument for it.
