> I'm not the one making inaccurate statements. I NEVER said I was against
libreboot's existence.
Except, you've demonstrated it through your actions and your words.
> I just think it's time has come and gone and you could be working on
something that will be
> more useful than libreboot will be in the coming years.
I'm working on libreboot, and doing what I can to make it grow. Libreboot is
definitely quite useful, IMO.
> If we have other bootloaders that work perfectly fine (unlike with X86)
then we don't need libreboot any more (because X86 is dead).
Libreboot supports non-x86 hardware (ARM, Rockchip RK3288 SoC) now, and plans
to add more very soon.
> I don't agree that it's good for other architectures.
Yeah, I call BS on that. Also, see what I wrote about integrating u-boot in
libreboot. I was serious.
> Ultimately I just think your better off working on some other project at
this point
Why do you keep insisting that I move onto another project? You actually know
full well that I do most of the work on libreboot, and that I have no
intention of ever quitting from it.
Why do you keep insisting that I move onto another project? Because, as
previously stated and demonstrated, you want the libreboot project to
disappear.
> I'm aware that the FSF is 'deeply' involved in coreboot/libreboot. That
doesn't change anything.
I'm pretty sure it does mean a lot, but OK.
> If there is a good reason to continue libreboot I'm all ears. However I
haven't heard a really great argument for it.
You've heard plenty of excellent arguments, but since you're hostile to it
you want to try and discredit it as much as possible, hence statements like
this.
