> What about the subliminal message "our computers and networks are owned,
securing our communications is moot, give up"?
Nobody said "give up". You should really stop putting words into other
people's mouths. I have asked you to stop it so many times, yet you keep
doing it.
> If I was a conspiracy theorist (I am not), I would suggest heyjoe and you
infiltrated the Trisquel community to demotivate those who want to secure
their communications.
heyjoe is the person who showed something practical in investigating and
improving security of web browsers. What did you do about it? You criticized
him from the very beginning, posted various inflammatory, confusing and time
wasting off-topic remarks and at the end you started licensing your forum
posts. Do you really think what you did helps anyone to improve the security
of their communication? Or you are just throwing mud at others, so that your
perfect knowledge can shine? Would you rather prefer the info about browsers
not to have been shared, so everyone can live an illusory life in the fancy
words of ideologies and motivational talkers?
heyjoe also opened a thread to discuss ideas about a new network model. What
did you do? - You posted in it just to explain that because it doesn't fit in
what you know, it is inefficient, anti-ecological and what not, when the
whole idea was to discuss a possible new approach, share other ideas etc. You
simply dump everything which doesn't conform to what you stick to. Yet you
say that others are demotivators. Great, hats off. Maybe we should all sit
together in a church and sing motivational Gnulellujahs which would be the
ultimate security of communication?
heyjoe is also the person who invited everyone into an in depth discussion
about what we could actually do to optimize security of current systems and
to create new truly secure systems, considering (and _not_ neglecting) the
actual issues which currently exist. How many people joined and showed real
interest? Just look at your only post in that thread and how "motivating" it
is.
As Abdullah explained - creating a false sense of security and safety is much
more dangerous than facing actual insecurity.
