*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
HI Roberto
  Good Points.


Keep on TROMing
Pete

--- On Tue, 4/5/11, default_1@gmx <[email protected]> wrote:

From: default_1@gmx <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [TROM1] needed TROM materials without 'Scientologese'
To: "'The Resolution of Mind  list'" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2011, 3:32 AM

*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************


 
Sorry for bluntly jumping in whilst usually only reading (and 
fighting
with the English language) and not even having introduced 
myself.
But I felt a responsibility here to offer you my opinion for 
evaluation.
 
1. re gradient
The materials of TROM, very obviously if you think about it, 
triggers
reactions: old overwhelms, losses, overts, motivators - any shit 
you
can think. You could ease the materials down to any desired 
level
- 
pictures, comics, filmed instructions - it wouldn't help a bit. It 
would
trigger the bank anyway and the bank in return hinders 
understanding
and the whole thing goes round in circles.
 
I 
am slowly, slowly beginning to understand that PD and SD and 
four
legs et cetera stuff. But hey, I am on level 3, I do not need to 
know
more than 3. I 
didn't know about level 3 when I was on level 2, and 
I'm
too lazy to reread level 4 before I am done with 
level 3.
 
2. re alterations
That's making all alarm bells ring. From observation I deduced 
that
alterations are manifestations of games conditions. For needed 
and
reasonable alterations no one seems to care...
 
I 
see it happen all the time in the advertising business. 
Someone
comes up with a faulty idea: it passes. Someone comes up 
with
a 
great idea: it gets watered down. Why? A hundred people try 
to
take ownership of the idea. The 
creative director says: "jeah not bad
that design, but move this line here a bit to the left - see! better 
now
isn't it?" Now he owns it, he's in the delusion that he's the 
man.
 
Yes, I hate to admit that Dennis is so much more clever than I 
am
and that not in a million years I would have come up with such 
stuff.
But I'd rather go into the game of getting ahead of him by 
completing
level 5 ;-)
 
3. complementary material
I 
had planned to write some material in German, but I dropped the 
idea
for the moment. Because I think that's full of booby traps too. 
Examples
and explanations and interpretations are the covered and therefore 
most
dangerous way of altering things. In that regard, a 
certain Mr. L. Ron was
right.
 
4. Scn Definitions
The holy cow of Scn is the correctness of the tech. The all agree 
wildly,
even many of the Ex's. In my amateurish opinion, besides all genius, 
there
are many, many technical errors. Yes, Scn was needed education 
for
Dennis, but there it ends for me and Scn becomes history. TROM 
may
contain Scn but for me, there doesn't exist any present 
association
between the two subjects or any benefit from using anything Scn.
 
Sorry for that exhausting amount of words...
 
Best wishes and greetings from Switzerland
Roberto
 
 


  
  
  Von: Aarre Peltomaa 
  [mailto:[email protected]] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. April 2011 
  03:17
An: The Resolution of Mind list
Betreff: Re: [TROM1] 
  needed TROM materials without 'Scientologese'


  
  Hi 
  Harry,                                          April 
  4/'11
                                                                                
  QUERY
   
  Very well put.  Thanks.   So am I correct,  that you 
  wouldn't even want annotated numbered definitions at the bottoms of the pages 
  in the original manual?  It indicates to me to defer to and trust your 
  judgement on this.
   
  Thanks so much,
  Aarre Peltomaa
  [email protected]
  (647) 
  202-7267             
  


  On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Happy Harry <[email protected]> 
  wrote:

  
    *************
The following message is relayed to you by 
     [email protected]
************
Hey 
    guys,

I thought I'd add a few cents (or pence) to this discussion 
    concerning study aids for TROM.

Some sections of the TROM manual may 
    be a bit hard to understand (at first) - I'm not going to deny that.
And 
    this is further compounded for those without a Scientology 
    background.

But, and this is a big "but", it is not the task or 
    responsibility (or even the right) of this list to alter or rearrange the 
    original manual in any way. I'm compelled to agree with Pete in this 
    matter.

The original text states, in the foreword: "It is of course 
    each person’s responsibility to fully understand the text and apply it to 
    themselves correctly. There is help and support provided on a list on the 
    internet."

"It is each person's responsibility"...I think that says 
    it all.

Furthermore (in the section entitled 'Finale'): "When you 
    duplicate the data, you duplicate it exactly. Not because I am enamored 
with 
    my prose style, but because altered it could very easily become just 
another 
    trap in a universe already abundantly endowed with them."

I think it 
    would be terribly, terribly WRONG to alter the manual in an attempt to 
    'simplify' it. It would also be wrong to tell people how to read it, what 
    parts of it to read and it what order. Everytime you alter something, no 
    matter how good your intentions may have been, you get into hot 
    water.

That being said, it can't hurt to put together a couple of 
    study aids. Surely you all know that there are study aids for major works 
of 
    literature. The student would refer to the study aid (e.g. CliffsNotes) to 
    aid in the understanding of the primary text. You wouldn't just read the 
    study aid without reading the original work.

And so it might be a 
    good idea to put together some study guide, glossary of terms or something 
    like that. But such material MUST emphasise that they are merely "study 
    aids" and that the original manual is the "primary source" and should be 
    studied primarily. They should always encourage the reader to read the 
    original manual, they should always direct him back to it, NOT AWAY FROM 
    IT.

In no case should the original manual itself be altered in ANY 
    way.

Anyway, these are my thoughts on the matter, and I thought I'd 
    share them with you...

Harry

    
    
    

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> 
    Sent: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:52:53 -0400
> To: [email protected]
> 
    Subject: [TROM1] needed TROM materials without 
    'Scientologese'
>
> *************
> The following message 
    is relayed to you by  [email protected]
> 
    ************
> 
    _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing 
    list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

____________________________________________________________
Share 
    photos & screenshots in seconds...
TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if1
Works in 
    all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social 
    networks.
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing 
    list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to