On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 21:39:19 -0500 "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Me in Green.

 

 

On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 19:33:42 -0500 "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Judy,

jt: Studying to show oneself approved unto God by rightly dividing the Word of Truth does not need to involve striving over words Jonathan. In fact we are warned against such, along with endless genealogies.

 

JBH:  Actually it does mean striving over words as long as they are pointing to Christ.  God has chosen to use words to communicate much of Himself.  And for the record I find the first nine chapters of 1 Chronicles rather boring

 

jt: I don't care for the genealogies either, or striving over words when Jesus is The Word. The other is a big waste of time.

 

Jonathan: So, we must ask ourselves, what is this truth that the Spirit will lead us into?  I would suggest that this truth is the Truth � Jesus Christ.  The Spirit will lead you to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ. 

 

jt: I don't expect Him to locate verses in my concordance or words in my dictionary. I do expect that He will give me understanding since he is the author of what I am attempting to understanding and Jesus is the ONLY mediator.

 

JBH:  You are correct that Jesus is the only mediator.  However, you are incorrect in your use of context.  Jesus is the only mediator between you and the Father.  To mediate is not to give information; it is to restore relationship; nothing to do with Bible Study.  Although you claim that you are not into the occult above you seem to believe that God will mystically give you understanding without you having to work it out. 

 

jt: You got this mystical idea all by yourself Jonathan. I spend time in God's Word. I do my own homework, it's just that I don't look to validate truth in the writings of theologians or Church Fathers.

 

JBH: Why read the Bible at all if the Spirit will give you all the information you need? 

 

jt: Because I need to know what spirit is speaking to me and I hold the understanding coming my way to the Isaiah 8:20 test.

 

 JBH: Why did God give us brains? 

 

jt: God gave us "books, brains, and buddies" so that we could learn some things, but not necessarily spiritual things. Remember God is a Spirit and he communicates with us on a spiritual level.

 

JBH: I would suggest that He gave them to us in order that we may use them.  For all the love of scripture that you seem to have (honestly) I am mystified that you could care less to find out what they actually meant in their original languages.  To me that makes me think that you would rather use the Bible as a tool to justify your own beliefs instead of having the Bible speak for itself.

 

jt: My belief is that the Holy Spirit can speak English and the KJV translaters were diligent and godly men. Why is it so outlandish for me to trust these translaters when you trust so many different theologians to guide you in spite of the original languages?

 

Cults begin from people that think that it is just God, the Bible, and them.  This explains where you have gotten some of your cultic beliefs (other than from the Watchtower).

 

jt: No Cults begin with opportunists who desire a following and who twist God's Word so that they are indispensible and they are the only ones with the inside track to God. 

 

JBH:   And cults always begin with people thinking that their interpretation of scripture is given by God Himself with no mediator.  I don�t know of a single cult that has not begun this way.  �Me, God and the Bible� is dangerous.

 

jt: But I do have a mediator - his name is Jesus and the Watchtower Society reject Him. They say he is an archangel ...

 

JBH: As much as you would like to deny it, to deny the eternal Sonship of Jesus Christ is pure heresy and places you outside of the �faith� by orthodox standards.  Please note it does not place you outside of the faith for me.  To me you are wholly accepted.

 

jt: I don't see the phrase "eternal Sonship of Jesus Christ" anywhere, not anywhere in scripture and would have to cobble a lot of things together and do a lot of rationalizing to come to this concensus. I would rather take scripture as it reads and accept that He was begotten on the day in history when Christ was born.  Jesus Himself said "Lo I come in the volume of the book, I delight to do your will O My God"

 

JBH:  Actually you don�t see any English words in the Bible.  They were all written in other languages (Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic).  You are reading a translation.  No where in scripture is the word Jesus!  No where in scripture is the word God!  No where in scripture is the word repentance.  I would love it if you would actually take scripture as it reads but you refuse to.  You will take scripture as it was translated though.  And of course you will pick and choose which translation you will accept.  You obviously (And I am being serious here) love scripture.  Why not go the extra step and actually study what it said?

 

JBH: And for the record I do not commend David Miller for his faithfulness to the truth.  Rather I commend him for his faithfulness to his opinion.  Unfortunately they are not one and the same.  It is because they are not that he had to leave Truthtalk.  JBH

 

jt: I find it sad that you don't appreciate a "faithful" brother. If you can show me a foundation for this "eternal Sonship of Jesus Christ" in the scriptures rather than in John MacArthur I will gladly reconsider - jht

 

JBH:  I do appreciate a faithful brother and I do appreciate David in some things, not in this.  And honestly are you a Jehovah Witness?  It would explain some of your comments on blood as well.  I am only mildly joking here; you actually seem to have some of their cultic beliefs.

 

jt: No I am not a Watchtower Advocate Jonathan; why not ease up on the cults and the theologians and study the scriptures?


 

 

In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.....  is the "faith" once

delivered to the saints Jonathan.  We ought to be commending David Miller for his faithfulness to the Truth.  jht

 

On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:35:40 -0500 "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Dear David Miller,

After weeks of deliberation all of us have come to a consensus that you must go.  I am sure that this is not a surprise to you.  The continual use of violent logic attacks on the members of Truthtalk and the continued plagiarizing of biblical texts contribute to this decision.  The pride exhibited in your continual use of the Latin term [sic] has put most of us over the edge.  Today you have stepped outside the bounds of the Christian faith.  By denying the eternal Sonship of Jesus Christ you have thrown away any claim to living out the faith that was once delivered to all saints.  You have said goodbye to historic orthodoxy and welcomed radical liberalism.  It is my duty to inform you, as seconded by Linda Shields, that you will now be shunned and removed from fellowship by all Truthtalk participants.  Once repentance, including copious amounts of tears has taken place you may apply for membership again by a handwritten note in Hebrew to Slade Henson.  It is hoped that by taking this action you will come to your senses and begin to act in a Christian manner.  Until then we must deliver you to the wiles and fancies of your mind.  Be safe, but be gone.

 

The Truthtalk Bouncer,  Jonathan Hughes

 

 

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.818 / Virus Database: 556 - Release Date: 12/17/2004

 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.818 / Virus Database: 556 - Release Date: 12/17/2004

 


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.818 / Virus Database: 556 - Release Date: 12/17/2004


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.818 / Virus Database: 556 - Release Date: 12/17/2004

 

Reply via email to