Re: [TruthTalk] The Humanity of Jesus

[Judy Taylor]

jt: Then the crux is choice just like it was in the garden - rather than the kind of flesh He was getting about it?   On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:08:35 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: You are correct and have proved my point.  Jesus could have chosen to sin.  However, He did not.  izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor   Any human is able to sin.  Having "sinful" flesh isn't a requirement.  The first Adam did not have sinful flesh and he managed - Jesus could have chosen the same way he did - and this doesn't make Him any less of a Savior & He is just as Wonderful -   judyt   On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:12:54 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Judy, if you don’t have sinful flesh you are not a man.  You are another creature altogether. Sinful flesh does NOT make one a sinner, or impure.  It makes one VULNERABLE to sin.  Sin is an ACT.  Every human being has succumbed to sinful acts because of our sinful, vulnerable flesh EXCEPT for Jesus.  THAT is what makes Him our Wonderful Savior!!!  Halleluia!!!   izzy     Judy wrote: Noone is arguing this point David, I think we all agree that he was a man. It is the "sinful" flesh that is causing the problem.