From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Terry wrote:
> His desire, David, was to do the will of the Father.
> Self was never a consideration for Jesus.
> If He had other desires, I am not aware of them.
 
I don't mean to keep pressing an issue you would rather drop, but I don't
understand how you can reconcile what you say here with your belief that
Jesus denied himself from start to finish.  You don't see that to deny
oneself, one must deny self?  If he denied himself, how can you say that
self was never a consideration?
  Think about this and please try to explain
it.  It seems like a contradiction to me.  It is a logical inconsistency in
your viewpoint, is it not?
 
jt: Isn't it also a logical inconsistency to claim to  believe
"Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today, and forever" and then go on
to teach that He was the second member of the Godhead from eternity past,
equal with the Father in every way a holy self, until He took upon himself a
sinful self in the form of a body, after which He was resurrected to a "glorious
risen self"?  judyt
 

Reply via email to