On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:50:49 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They have roads named after you JD :)They are all listed un "straight and narrow."jt: The ones I was thinking of were "One Way"How is it you want to call "the fall" a "doctrine of original sin" and insist that noone is judged beforel they presonally sin.You do this not me. I don't believe the fall has anything to do with original sin, but you do, of course.The answer to the last part of your question is Ro 5:13 ("we all die because we all sin").jt: We are all fallen because Adam fell and this is why death reigned and why we are so in need of a daysman redeemer.regardless. Yet when it comes to "righteousness" you appear to be holding to some kind of exaggerated "positional truth" doctrine where Christ did it all for you and you just need to receive - it is conferred on you by faith whether or not you walk in righteousness because he has done it for you.Exactly - but you think this translates into a "free ride" of unholy living and rebellion - which it does not.jt: Well I'm glad to hear this. I wasn't sure what it translated into.If you won't accept the first Adam fell and you inherited his fallout how can you so easily believe that the righteousness of the second Adam is just layed on you with no responsibility on your part? Isn't this a little lopsided?Easy. The first nuance has no Bible to support it; the second does. I do not inherit Adam's sin.Where is this taught? JDjt: Everyone has to die - where did that come from? Why does everyone sin and why does everyonehave to die JD?
