|
We should make accusing each other personally a
matter to be discussed offline.
I find these constant accusations to be both
discouraging and wearying - are we interested in Truth or
not?
Why give the enemy a platform to tear each
other down.
DAVEH: I don't think you understand the nature of my posts,
Perry. I'm not talking about your sexual experiences. I'm
talking about Christian hypocrisy and the double standard
as practiced on TT. Is the double standard on TT not a fair
topic? Why should I have to discuss that matter
offline? Is this not relevant to all TTers,
Perry?
I find it very telling that you make
false accusations against me.......
you suggest I might have some
knowledge of Izzy's sexual experiences,
.........which I did not
do. Go back and read my exact words if you don't believe me. If
you can't find them, I'll gladly provide them and you can see for yourself
that you are again accusing me of something I did not do.
you
suggest that saying "one of Joseph Smiths spiritual wives" might have some
sexual connotation,
..........That has been suggested before on TT
by other TTers, and the moderator did nothing to discourage such
comments. Now you want to ban me from posting something other TTers can
post with no retribution. This is simply another example of a double
standard.
you try to spin Dean up by suggesting he gets "excited" by
sexual references.
.........I merely stated the truth about
Deans sensitivity to such things. This was not an ad-hom attack.
Is the truth now a problem on TT? People have said a lot more
vile things about me with no condemnation by the moderator. Why the
double standard now, Perry?
these amount to false
accusations,
DAVEH: How can that possibly be a
false accusation if it is true, Perry? If anything, it is
you who is making false accusations about me in this
matter. Once again....a TT double standard.
the intentions
of spinning Dean up on a banned topic
DAVEH: You
are absolutely wrong again, Perry. You simply fail to understand the
nature of my posts. My intentions are not to spin up Dean at all.
It is you who I am trying to enlighten as to the Christian hypocrisy
involving the double standard practiced on TT with regard to Mormons.
Until you as the moderator recognize it, why should I discontinue
pointing it out every time it occurs? Is not the TT double standard an
acceptable discussion topic?
Charles Perry
Locke wrote:
Dave, you suggest I might have some knowledge of Izzy's
sexual experiences, then you suggest that saying "one of Joseph
Smiths spiritual wives" might have some sexual connotation, then
you try to spin Dean up by suggesting he gets "excited" by sexual
references. These amount to false accusations, with
the intentions of spinning Dean up on a banned topic. Any more
posts from you containing sexual references and I will have to take you off
the forum until you agree not to do so. Take any issues you have up with me,
offline, at this address, not on the forum.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **
Date: Tue, 13 Dec
2005 07:29:32 -0800
* Please try to /refrain /from making
sexual references, especially /false accuastions/.*
DAVEH: Let's see if I understand this, Perry.
Recently I asked some questions that were no more sexually oriented than
what you commonly make, Dean then claimed foul......and you banned further
discussion based on the /perception /you and Dean had about what those
comments might have implied.
Now you have made a
comment that can be perceived to be sexually charged..........
*If
lucky, you may become one of his many spirit wives! *
..........and you don't want to recognize the double
standard? It is interesting that when you or other TTers make any
kind of denigrating remarks toward LDS theology with sexual implications,
nothing is considered off limits. When I point out this obvious
double standard, I am cautioned by the moderator to /refrain /from
bringing the discussion to the TT table under the guise of making/ false
accusations/. It must be convenient to have a moderator who can see
non-LDS posters through one non-judgmental eye, and perceive a completely
different perspective of LDS posters through the other, more critical
eye. I suppose if one has an ax to grind against LDS theology, and
is not embarrassed to publicly admit such....then it should not surprise
anybody to find that person practicing a double standard. The
curious part about this is that it happens on a forum called /TruthTalk/,
where /truth /is presupposed to be the dominating factor, yet it seems to
be suppressed when it comes to recognizing the Christian hypocrisy found
here.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
* Please try to /refrain
/from making sexual references, especially /false accuastions/.* This is
not the forum for that? I am sure there are many discussion forums about
sex if that type of discussion interests you.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Perry's Sexually Suggestive Comments
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:07:35 -0800
**If lucky, you may
become one of his many spirit wives! **
DAVEH: I
wonder if Dean is going to rebuke you for making such sexually
suggestive comments, Perry! If not, will we then have
another example of hypocritical Christianity in TT?
Charles
Perry Locke wrote:
Just be sure you remember your secret
password and secret handshake so Joseph Smith will allow you
entrance into heaven. *If lucky, you may become one of his many
spirit wives! *
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Signing off...
Date: Mon, 12 Dec
2005 18:19:35 EST
I guess I never got to know you,
Christine--but hope to meet you in the
great beyond--you may
be required to testify at the Bar of God as to what you
have
seen and heard on TT--
Blainerb
In a message dated
12/11/2005 11:24:52 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I am signing off. I have gotten sucked into
the world of TT, and I think it
would be beneficial to
my GPA to bid adeiu. Thanks for all the discussions. I
have learned a great deal. May the Lord bless you and
keep you all.
It would be cool to meet you all in
real life some day. But maybe not all in
the same room.
I wonder how that would turn out... :-)
-Christine
Miller
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
|
