Why in the world do you put a "happy face" behind a statment that you do not intend to be funny or even tongue in cheek? You do it often and it is never funny.
jd
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Wrong again, Lance. You have overlooked the very reason the Scriptures have
> been given to us. The Scriptures are profitable for reproof, for
> correction, and for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be
> perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. Of course, the
> Scriptures won't help if you are dealing with someone who is not a man of
> God. :-)
>
> You should consider taking up street preaching in your old age, Lance. It
> would help you fulfill the following passage:
>
> Titus 1:9
> (9) Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be
> able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.
>
> David Miller.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> F rom: Lance Muir
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 1:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
>
>
> Going to the Bible will NOT bring the issue to resolution, Dean. Judy, DM,
> Gary, Bill, John, even I, though only on the rarest of occasions, can muster
> adequate Scriptural support for a 'view'. Sometimes that 'view' is God's.
> Sometimes that 'view' is one's own.
>
> ---- Original Message -----
> From: Dean Moore
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: January 15, 2006 12:57
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lance Muir
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: 1/15/2006 12:31:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
>
>
> EVERY VIEW IS SUPPORTABLE, DEAN!! The better 'taught' one is, the more < BR>> comprehensive that person's presentation is. This applies equally to right
> as well as wrong views. IMO, your view is a wrong view on this matter..
>
> cd: That of course would make it wrong because it is in contrast to you
> view?So how do we know which view is correct-go to the Bible-or some other
> source?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dean Moore
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: January 15, 2006 12:21
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
>
>
> cd: Lance you need to recognize that this view is made up of much study and
> that I can support it with scripture so it is not something just spoke off
> of the top of my head as you seem to suppose. If one is to evaluate the
> speaker then one must also consider the speakers past statements to
> determine the availability of truth offer by the speaker.Which statement do
> you want me to support?
>
& gt;
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lance Muir
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: 1/15/2006 9:13:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
>
>
> Key:'I view'. Please take note as all conversations are similary constructed
> JT and DM.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dean Moore
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: January 15, 2006 09:06
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
>
>
> cd: I view the word "unbelief" to portray a larger image than what has been
> stated in this discussion. To have unbelief is not only to reject the person
> of Christ but to also reject his words which very clearly points one towards
> God's law and God's grace. So if John 3:18 is correct then one must receive
> this larger image if not on new birth then later at the bidding of the Holy
> Ghost. Note and point : One sin can send one to hell if there is refusal of
> compliance to the conviction power of the Spirit (1 Cor 6:9)-so be not
> deceived-but sin can also make one least in the kingdom of heaven.This
> speaks of a personal judgement between the person and God.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Judy Taylor
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: 1/15/2006 8:28:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
>
>
> If this Victor person is correct and "UNBELIEF" is the predicament humanity
> is in then why was the Holy Spirit
> sent to reprove the WORLD (note this is not just God's covenant ppl) of SIN,
> righteousness, and judgment?
> (John 16:8) Why didn't God send Him as an antidote to "unbelief" only if
> this is the main problem??
>
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:50:35 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> ----- Original Messag e -----
> From: Debbie Sawczak
> To: 'Lance Muir'
> Sent: January 14, 2006 17:02
> Subject: OK, done working for now
>
>
> paragraph in this lecture of Victor's:
>
> I've often said, too, that the hardest part of any service of worship for
> the minister is the children's story, because nearly all the children's
> stories here are moralistic bromides. It's just moralistic bromide. And the
> Gospel isn't heard because we assume that children can't understand the
> Gospel. They can be taught not to steal, and they can be taught not to
> swear, but they can't understand the Gospel. This is ridiculous, but keep
> your eye on the Christian education wing of your church or denomination,
> because that's where the Gospel goes down.
>
> It strikes me that street preaching and children's sermons go down the same
> wrong path!
>
> Paragraph from next lecture:
>
> The protestant refor mers maintain that the root problem is Sin and it gives
> rise to sins. But be sure you know which is which, or you will never come to
> terms with the Gospel. Morality maintains that little "s" sins plural is the
> human predicament. The Gospel maintains that capital "S" Sin singular -
> unbelief - is the predicament.
>
> This is the difference between David's understanding of repentance and
> Bill's/JD's.
>
> D
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/229 - Release Date: 1/13/2006
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how
> you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend
> who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> he will be subscribed.
