On 02/08/13 20:37 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > A Divendres 02 Agost 2013 18:12:42, Sergi Almacellas Abellana va escriure: > > Al 29/07/13 13:49, En/na LAG Robin Baumgartner ha escrit: > > >> Corresponding feature request: https://bugs.tryton.org/issue3320 > > > > > > I would appreciate some more feedback on this proposal, especially > > > from the participants of the discussion. Does it reflect the ideas > > > you had in mind? > > > > I had been reviewing the code and testing the new functionalities and > > for me its a very good improvement in the workflow. Congrats! > > > > Another thing I have commented on the codereview, but i would like to > > comment also here to get more audience: > > > > For me every opportunity will have two amount fields: > > > > - Expected amount -> The one that exists nowadays. > > - Won amount -> The sum of the amount of all the confirmed sales. This > > will be a function field and will only be evaluated when the state is > > won. All the reports should use this amount for Won amount, and won > > rates to get the real revenue of the sale, not the expected amount (as > > it's done nowadays) > > > > Thoughts? > > I agree but why should it only be evaluted when the state is won? I think it > should simply sum all confirmed sales.
Such summed Function field based on other Function field based on … are pretty slow (see the sale/purchase amount and invoice amount). I think it is better to store it and update it when the sale workflow is triggered. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpmNBCgt8RwK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
