On 15/08/13 10:15 +0000, LAG Robin Baumgartner wrote: > On 14.08.2013 12:08, Cédric Krier wrote: > >> I have pointed on the review [1] the principal issue for this > >> implementation (indeed already exist in the current one). So a > >> decision must be taken if we work at line or document level for > >> opportunities. > > Why not have both, line and document level links? I can't imagine the > benefit of discarding one or the other. It works now between sales and > invoices without issues, so why fix what is not broken?
Because it is broken by design (see normalization). > If inconsistency is your concern: these links are managed by Tryton > itself and are not to be changed by the user. Why not? > As long as the > implementation ensures consistency, there shouldn't be a problem. There is no such guarantee. > But if you insist on a exclusive decision between the two concepts, I'd > weight document level links over line level links. They are essential > for the relationship between our primary documents (opportunities, > sales, invoices, ...). Except it is done no where like that. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpZMuwiu8LmJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
