On 29/07/13 11:49 +0000, LAG Robin Baumgartner wrote: > On 23.07.2013 12:40, LAG Robin Baumgartner wrote: > > On 01.07.2013 09:59, LAG Robin Baumgartner wrote: > >> On 04.06.2013 10:36, Cédric Krier wrote: > >>> On 01/06/13 02:07 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > >>>> There's something in the workflow of opportunities that I think > >>>> could be improved. I don't think that the end of the workflow > >>>> should create a sale. The reason is that most probably, during > >>>> the sale process several quotations will already have been sent > >>>> to the party. > >>>> > >>>> I think that it would be more interesting to add a Many2One > >>>> field in sale.sale that refers to the opportunity to which the > >>>> sale is linked. Maybe the sale should only be created if no > >>>> previous quotations have been created and there are products > >>>> assigned to the opportunity. > >>> > >>> So let's keep the current workflow (create a sale on convertion) > >>> but just reverse the link between sale and opportunity. Like that > >>> the module is more flexible to be customized: > >>> > >>> - allow to create many sales from an opportunity (for people who > >>> don't like the idea of revision). > >>> - can split the generated sale using copy (link to opportunity > >>> will stay). > >>> - can use the future revision of sale (and use copy for split). > >>> - can add later new sales to an existing "converted" opportunity. > >>> > >>> PS: I would just prevent to delete the last sale of an > >>> opportunity. > >> > >> These are some nice proposals. As far as I can see, there is nobody > >> working on it yet, right? > >> > >> Since we'd like to get more involved with the community and we happen > >> to have a customer with these exact requirements, I'd like to take > >> over this task. > >> > >> FYI: I'm on holiday for the next weeks, so don't expect a code review > >> before Juli 22nd. > >> > > > > Corresponding feature request: https://bugs.tryton.org/issue3320 > > I would appreciate some more feedback on this proposal, especially from > the participants of the discussion. Does it reflect the ideas you had in > mind?
I have pointed on the review [1] the principal issue for this implementation (indeed already exist in the current one). So a decision must be taken if we work at line or document level for opportunities. [1] http://codereview.tryton.org/992003/#msg43 -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpRoMYO7PgA0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
