On Oct 24, 1:34 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it has a calming effect on you, you might be interested in learning that I > don't use SA. Because when I'm in control over my schema, SO is all I need. > It features the relations I'm interested in, I'm perfectly ok with (actually > prefer) numeric IDs, using the SQLBuilder is easy enough to create complex > queries without resorting to SQL for nearly all use-cases (with a bit of > added goodies you'd otherwise miss when creating these yourself) and so > forth.
Personally I don't mind resorting to SQL for most things - I'm actually more comfortable with that in complex cases. I guess I'm just trying to make sure that I maximise my chances of being able to use any libraries and tools and other benefits that TG might be able to provide for me. I recall reading that some things (eg. Catwalk?) only work with SO, and so I figured that in the future certain things would only work with SA, and that's why I asked what the standard would be going forward. I hadn't realised that it would be a little more awkward to use, and I don't really know what else I gain from it. Possibly nothing! -- Ben Sizer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
