I thought it was a terrific mix of Who-ism and the sort of period 
broadcasting drama that was a significant element of "The Hour," which, by 
the way, was one of my favorite serialized programs in the past 5 years.

As for the Eccleston brouhaha, I thought Moffat and the DW production team 
did a great job of working around his diffidence/absence - and (Spoiler 
alert!) you can see his eyes and forehead start to appear (thanks to 
computer magic) as John Hurt's War Doctor regenerates. Not to mention some 
other Easter Eggy acknowledgement of the so-called 9th Doctor. DOTD itself? 
A definite treat - and a load of fun. Funny, clever, exciting and lots of 
subtle and satisfying fan service that didn't overwhelm or derail the 
project. I'll miss the charming and nimble Matt Smith, but, despite it 
being his swan-song, I'm looking forward to the Christmas special, and the 
passing of the torch to Peter Capaldi in the title role.

On Monday, November 25, 2013 11:02:07 PM UTC-8, Kevin M. (RPCV) wrote:
>
> Did anybody else watch the made-for-TV movie about the behind the scenes 
> of the first few years of The Doctor? It was tailored to please Who fans, 
> and a not too subtle pat on the back for the BBC, but I was unaware of how 
> groundbreaking the production team was on the show.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:39 PM, PGage <[email protected] <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, David Bruggeman 
>> <[email protected]<javascript:>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> (SNIP) Given one of the plot arcs in the piece, having his Doctor around 
>>> could have made a great deal of sense.  I enjoyed the special just fine, 
>>> but I missed having Nine about.
>>>
>>
>> I really enjoyed The Day of the Doctor, and thought it was a big 
>> improvement over the previous season's episodes. But  Eccleston's absence 
>> was definitely felt. And, as someone who only got into Who in the modern 
>> era, the Special that gave a retrospective was also appreciated, and unlike 
>> most such things, actually was helpful for picking up some nuances (but not 
>> plot points) of the DOTD.
>>  
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected] <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Kevin M. (RPCV) 
>

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to