I am curious if there has ever been an official response from twitter
on why some simple HTML has not been allowed in a tweet? If we were
able to use an anchor tag, and the HTML did not count against the 140
character limit, then the need for a URL shortener service would not
On Jul 8, 10:27 am, sull <sullele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ironically, my example urls are shortened here ;)
> On Jul 8, 12:20 pm, sull <sullele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > this is a topic of interest to me for a long while.
> > been meaning to start a thread.
> > i'm often bothered by the automatic shortening of urls when in fact
> > the url does not need to be shortened. in these cases, i of course do
> > not want to hide the real url by using a forced 3rd party service like
> > bit.ly.
> > i have use cases where all that is posted is a url. and the url
> > includes a long detailed description of the link. this, in my
> > opinion, is smart as the only object to maintain is the url itself
> > which provides a hyperlink and a short message combined. sometimes,
> > these use cases are using natural language vanity urls to form short
> > sentences.
> > ie.http://john.tot.al.ly/wiped-out-on-this-huge-wave-in-hawaii-at-the-Su...
> > the other annoying thing that is related to the twitter UI is how long
> > urls are cut-off//trimmed even if they dont need to be. the above
> > example would be destroyed because it would result in something
> > like:
> > actually, i'm not certain if that is still the case as it seems to me
> > that every url is shortened with bit.ly now. i grok the value in
> > tracking urls and bit.ly may be bought by twitter at some point and
> > this notion of url tracking will be fully integrated.... but the
> > debate about url shortners in general.... how they can break the
> > natural web, are vulnerable to massive broken links and simply thr
> > cryptic format itself that hides the true location.... are all to be
> > considered and continued to be debated.
> > at the very least, 3rd party developers should get an override
> > toggle.
> > that is something i think we all need to start demanding.
> > and yes, an official doc explaining the current and future
> > impementations of url shortening on twitter is definitely needed now.
> > @sull
> > On Jul 8, 4:50 am, Swaroop <rh.swar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > "However, if you paste in a link that is less than 30 characters,
> > > we'll post it in its entirety. If it's longer than 30 characters,
> > > we'll convert it to a shorter URL."
> > > Source:http://help.twitter.com/portal