This entire debate focuses on the wrong side of the coin.
Follow churn exists as a side effect of the improper Twitter culture of
reciprocating follows blindly.

If users paid due diligence to those they follow and only followed those
people who demonstrate some value to them, follower churn would not exist.
 Period.


On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:51 AM, owkaye <owk...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > > Would be very helpful to know the definition of "quick"
> > > as relates to following churn suspensions.
> >
> > As Cameron pointed out earlier, as soon as they do that,
> > the following churners will adjust their methods to be
> > just inside that definition of OK.
>
> This seems like a really short-sighted reason for NOT
> clarifying what's acceptable and what's not.
>
> If it's acceptable then who cares if the churners adjust
> their methods?  At least everyone will know how to avoid
> problems for a change, right?
>
>


-- 
Kevin Mesiab
CEO, Mesiab Labs L.L.C.
http://twitter.com/kmesiab
http://mesiablabs.com
http://retweet.com

Reply via email to