Just thinking, I cannot recall ever having seen in the Twitter TOS
where it says that it is a violation of their TOS to assist or enable
others to violate their TOS. It is probably just an oversight, and
it's something that should be in a Developer TOS.

But, even if they did that, they would be painting themselves into a
corner if they did not very clearly and very exactly define each
clause of the TOS. Not doing that is simply sending them into a very
dark alley of extremely bad publicity.


On Aug 12, 10:31 am, Andrew Badera <and...@badera.us> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Dewald Pretorius<dpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And if a judge refused to hear the case, that's also setting some
> precedent, and forces Twitter to provide clearer terms if they expect
> to pursue similar matters in the future.
> ∞ Andy Badera
> ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private
> ∞ Google me:http://www.google.com/search?q=(andrew+badera)+OR+(andy+badera)

Reply via email to