The second you can play drinking games based on how many times a company is mentioned on local news; I think that companies ability to be "clear and unambiguous" becomes as hard as not getting hammered in 5 minutes of watching the news.

Iphone says hello.

On Aug 12, 2009, at 6:04 AM, Dewald Pretorius <> wrote:

Logically, isn't it necessary that a clear and unambiguous definition
of "aggressive following" to be publicly available before any legal
action can be based on it?

Reply via email to