The second you can play drinking games based on how many times a
company is mentioned on local news; I think that companies ability to
be "clear and unambiguous" becomes as hard as not getting hammered in
5 minutes of watching the news.
Iphone says hello.
On Aug 12, 2009, at 6:04 AM, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Logically, isn't it necessary that a clear and unambiguous definition
of "aggressive following" to be publicly available before any legal
action can be based on it?