Better overlook, SSL to imgur: ICS: http://i.imgur.com/CUCytnL.png (almost twice the frames) SYN: http://i.imgur.com/hKZ7diY.png
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:30 PM, brian - <hikarito...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You never mentioned you were testing the synchronous methods of the > component, that is not a fair test of ICS performance, you should be > using proper events and the async component methods. > > > I'm observing the same issue with async calls though, did the same test > from above but this time with PostAsync, waited for RequestDone: 49 seconds. > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:06 PM, brian - <hikarito...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Captured with Microsoft Network Monitor, non-SSL post to my server: >> >> Synapse: 3.8s http://pasted.co/1f69a8a8 >> ICS: 46.5s >> https://mega.nz/#!b05jyRzT!hLB8_xKHeHJyRb7nAXcQDM2mv0_RW9uf4y-iN3e6gkc >> (too large for text paste sites) >> >> few lines from each: >> >> Frame, time, time offset, process, source, destination, protocol, >> description, conv id >> >> SYN >> 520 17:41:32 2016-Apr-18 10.0849405 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** TCP TCP:[Continuation to >> #474]Flags=...A...., SrcPort=58338, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=1436, >> Seq=61535050 - 61536486, Ack=220751404, Win=258 (scale factor 0x8) = >> 66048 {TCP:75, IPv4:18} >> 521 17:41:32 2016-Apr-18 10.0849470 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** TCP TCP:[Continuation to >> #474]Flags=...A...., SrcPort=58338, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=1436, >> Seq=61536486 - 61537922, Ack=220751404, Win=258 (scale factor 0x8) = >> 66048 {TCP:75, IPv4:18} >> 522 17:41:32 2016-Apr-18 10.1643870 Project1.exe **dest >> host** 192.168.0.2 TCP TCP:Flags=...A...., SrcPort=HTTP(80), >> DstPort=58338, PayloadLen=0, Seq=220751404, Ack=61391450, Win=1167 (scale >> factor 0x7) = 149376 {TCP:75, IPv4:18} >> 523 17:41:32 2016-Apr-18 10.1644469 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** TCP TCP:[Continuation to >> #474]Flags=...A...., SrcPort=58338, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=1436, >> Seq=61537922 - 61539358, Ack=220751404, Win=258 (scale factor 0x8) = >> 66048 {TCP:75, IPv4:18} >> 524 17:41:32 2016-Apr-18 10.1644572 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** TCP TCP:[Continuation to >> #474]Flags=...A...., SrcPort=58338, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=1436, >> Seq=61539358 - 61540794, Ack=220751404, Win=258 (scale factor 0x8) = >> 66048 {TCP:75, IPv4:18} >> 525 17:41:32 2016-Apr-18 10.1647476 Project1.exe **dest >> host** 192.168.0.2 TCP TCP:Flags=...A...., SrcPort=HTTP(80), >> DstPort=58338, PayloadLen=0, Seq=220751404, Ack=61394322, Win=1167 (scale >> factor 0x7) = 149376 {TCP:75, IPv4:18} >> 526 17:41:32 2016-Apr-18 10.1647476 Project1.exe **dest >> host** 192.168.0.2 TCP TCP:Flags=...A...., SrcPort=HTTP(80), >> DstPort=58338, PayloadLen=0, Seq=220751404, Ack=61397194, Win=1167 (scale >> factor 0x7) = 149376 {TCP:75, IPv4:18} >> 527 17:41:32 2016-Apr-18 10.1647476 Project1.exe **dest >> host** 192.168.0.2 TCP TCP:Flags=...A...., SrcPort=HTTP(80), >> DstPort=58338, PayloadLen=0, Seq=220751404, Ack=61402938, Win=1167 (scale >> factor 0x7) = 149376 {TCP:75, IPv4:18} >> 528 17:41:32 2016-Apr-18 10.1647731 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** TCP TCP:[Continuation to >> #474]Flags=...A...., SrcPort=58338, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=1436, >> Seq=61540794 - 61542230, Ack=220751404, Win=258 (scale factor 0x8) = >> 66048 {TCP:75, IPv4:18} >> 529 17:41:32 2016-Apr-18 10.1647817 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** TCP TCP:[Continuation to >> #474]Flags=...A...., SrcPort=58338, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=1436, >> Seq=61542230 - 61543666, Ack=220751404, Win=258 (scale factor 0x8) = >> 66048 {TCP:75, IPv4:18} >> >> ICS >> 2251 17:50:17 2016-Apr-18 177.9631709 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** HTTP HTTP:HTTP Payload, URL: >> /test/upload.php {HTTP:289, TCP:288, IPv4:18} >> 2252 17:50:17 2016-Apr-18 177.9631750 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** TCP TCP:[Continuation to >> #2251]Flags=...AP..., SrcPort=58460, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=24, >> Seq=458800455 - 458800479, Ack=3147579723, Win=258 (scale factor 0x8) = >> 66048 {TCP:288, IPv4:18} >> 2253 17:50:17 2016-Apr-18 177.9631908 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** HTTP HTTP:HTTP Payload, URL: >> /test/upload.php {HTTP:289, TCP:288, IPv4:18} >> 2254 17:50:17 2016-Apr-18 177.9631942 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** TCP TCP:[Continuation to >> #2253]Flags=...AP..., SrcPort=58460, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=24, >> Seq=458801915 - 458801939, Ack=3147579723, Win=258 (scale factor 0x8) = >> 66048 {TCP:288, IPv4:18} >> 2255 17:50:17 2016-Apr-18 177.9632252 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** HTTP HTTP:HTTP Payload, URL: >> /test/upload.php {HTTP:289, TCP:288, IPv4:18} >> 2256 17:50:17 2016-Apr-18 177.9632296 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** TCP TCP:[Continuation to >> #2255]Flags=...AP..., SrcPort=58460, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=24, >> Seq=458803375 - 458803399, Ack=3147579723, Win=258 (scale factor 0x8) = >> 66048 {TCP:288, IPv4:18} >> 2257 17:50:17 2016-Apr-18 177.9632594 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** HTTP HTTP:HTTP Payload, URL: >> /test/upload.php {HTTP:289, TCP:288, IPv4:18} >> 2258 17:50:17 2016-Apr-18 177.9632631 Project1.exe >> 192.168.0.2 **dest host** TCP TCP:[Continuation to >> #2257]Flags=...AP..., SrcPort=58460, DstPort=HTTP(80), PayloadLen=24, >> Seq=458804835 - 458804859, Ack=3147579723, Win=258 (scale factor 0x8) = >> 66048 {TCP:288, IPv4:18} >> 2259 17:50:17 2016-Apr-18 178.0811555 Project1.exe **dest >> host** 192.168.0.2 TCP TCP:Flags=...A...., SrcPort=HTTP(80), >> DstPort=58460, PayloadLen=0, Seq=3147579723, Ack=458800479, Win=501 (scale >> factor 0x7) = 64128 {TCP:288, IPv4:18} >> 2260 17:50:17 2016-Apr-18 178.0811555 Project1.exe **dest >> host** 192.168.0.2 TCP TCP:Flags=...A...., SrcPort=HTTP(80), >> DstPort=58460, PayloadLen=0, Seq=3147579723, Ack=458801939, Win=501 (scale >> factor 0x7) = 64128 {TCP:288, IPv4:18} >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:14 PM, brian - <hikarito...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hm not sure if you can see my previous thread messages, I did some >>> little analysis: >>> >>> ICS: ~23s, 377 x 8KB, 55-60ms between packets: >>> http://pastebin.com/Uq5mphUH >>> ICS @ 64KB: ~22s, 48 x 64KB, 450-470ms between packets: >>> http://pastebin.com/wTat71Qe >>> SYN: ~6s, 49 x 64KB, 110-120ms between packets: >>> http://pastebin.com/g5svt11P >>> Indy: ~9s, 95 x 32KB, 70-80ms between packets: >>> http://pastebin.com/Dt2PydTR >>> WinInet: ~6s, 190 x ~16KB, 5-55ms between packets, >>> http://pastebin.com/jZLvua5u >>> >>> then tried to log timings through various stages of the post, albeit not >>> being that helpful, I think the main issue lies on OverbyteIcsHttpProt >>> around >>> >>> while FState <> httpReady do begin >>>> {$IFDEF MSWINDOWS} >>>> if MsgWaitForMultipleObjects(0, Pointer(nil)^, FALSE, 1000, >>>> QS_ALLINPUT) = WAIT_OBJECT_0 then >>>> {$ENDIF} >>>> MessagePump; >>>> >>> >>> I'll check on wireshark. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:44 PM, RTT <p...@sapo.pt> wrote: >>> >>>> On 18/04/2016 15:15, brian - wrote: >>>> >>>>> I know ICS is made for free by volunteers, I'm not expecting/demanding >>>>> a >>>>> fix, but I think this is an issue that we could look into to try to >>>>> find a >>>>> solution/find the core problem together. >>>>> >>>> >>>> To start, you could compare the characteristics of the packets being >>>> sent (e.g. using Wireshark), and the times involved, so we can get a >>>> general idea of what is being done differently in these HTTP components. >>>> Maybe this general analyzes offers the clues for what code needs to be >>>> optimized/profiled. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list >>>> please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket >>>> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
