WinInet: ~6s, 190 x ~16KB, 5-55ms between packets, http://pastebin.com/jZLvua5u
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:38 PM, brian - <[email protected]> wrote: > Some more tests (modified buffer size for the 2nd test) > > ICS: ~23s, 377 x 8KB, 55-60ms between packets: > http://pastebin.com/Uq5mphUH > ICS @ 64KB: ~22s, 48 x 64KB, 450-470ms between packets: > http://pastebin.com/wTat71Qe > SYN: ~6s, 49 x 64KB, 110-120ms between packets: > http://pastebin.com/g5svt11P > Indy: ~9s, 95 x 32KB, 70-80ms between packets: > http://pastebin.com/Dt2PydTR > > Even with a larger buffer it's still as slow. > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:01 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I updated the FTP client buffers to 32K several years ago for better >> performance. >> >> Yep this was 2011 and it made a huge difference for me. >> >> http://marc.info/?l=twsocket&m=131146591403948&w=2 >> >> And your response: >> >> Log: >> - Added published property DataSocketSndBufSize and public property >> DataSocketRcvBufSize. Increase DataSocketSndBufSize in order to >> make uploads faster. Both values default to value 8192 which is the >> default winsock size. >> >> >> http://marc.info/?l=twsocket&m=131152163805666&w=2 >> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list >> please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket >> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be >> > > -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
