>Tony Gravagno wrote:
>As is evident by these notes, it would seem that the challenge was
all about tools, but the opposite is true.
>it had nothing to do with GUI or technology and someone with AE/ED
and a greenscreen could have won.  

Tony, thank you so much for bring this perspective - the RIGHT ONE -
to the discussion.  There's been way too much focus on tools in the
discussion of last year's programming competition, and I frankly I for
one am immensely tired of what has turned into a slight of my
abilities, like somehow I couldn't have possibly won without the tools
I used?  (Those who have said such things know who you are.)

>Tools can certainly help, but last year we saw that the tools 
>actually got in the way when they became the focus.

My original concern is that the discussion of tools got in the way of
having the competition this year.  Personally, I was looking forward
to the competition after Gus and crew announced they had levelled the
playing field.  With the changing of the guard at the magazine I can
see now how the competition could have definitely been a back seat
issue.  I only hope that Nathan and Clif can find a way to hold the
competition next year, and even if they make us all solve the problem
with nothing more than a PE version out of the box, then I welcome the
opportunity to prove that solutions and tools are not as tightly
coupled as some have suggested.

>Assuming there will be another challenge, next year may 
>be different if a more clear message can be established 
>about what is expected.

Throw out the tools if necessary.  I'd even go as far as to not allow
participants to bring anything into the room.  Set up each participant
on a cheap laptop with a PE version, hand out a spec and say "go for
it".  Won't get much more level than that.  Problem is, as you've
pointed out, would the tool providers want to play if there wasn't a
marketing opportunity?  I would hope that wouldn't be true because as
you said...

>And remember - it's all for fun and prizes and 
>profiling our DBMS of choice, not to show 
>how great one's products are.

Amen, bro.  Thanks again.

-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to