Hi Joe,

1.    Please refer to the IBM manuals
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/u2/pubs/library/100univ/univ_101.ht
ml You make it sound as though the extensions for XML, SOAP, Websphere
and other emerging technologies have not been put inplace.

2.      It is supported by Masterpack amongst others. Is it really bad
that SAP don't have a version? Not everybody has the budget or need for
SAP/Peoplesoft. There is no current corporate edict that states, thou
must use SAP or else! Imagine a 20 user site trying to put in SAP, just
doesn't wash with me.

3.      UV has substantially less administrative requirement. I do not
spend my days checking on tables sizes, adding extents, chunks and
dbspaces etc. Yes it is slower because it uses cooked files but it has
less administrative overhead because of this.

4.      Can't dispute that. It is a personal choice, I can't see how you
can blame Universe for this one.

5.      Different strokes etc. Each of the above points is very much a
personal viewpoint. Facts? ;-), slow? that depends on who wrote the
software and what that software is doing. Total cost of ownership is
probably less with U2 than with the behemoths like DB2, Oracle and
MSSQL.

Just because it doesn't look like the rest doesn't mean it doesn't have
merit. DB2, Oracle and MSSQL have their places and their product
champions as do the u2 technologies.

Regards

David Logan
Database Administrator
HP Managed Services
139 Frome Street,
Adelaide 5000
Australia

+61 8 8408 4273
+61 417 268 665



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joe Eugene
Sent: Monday, 29 March 2004 12:54 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Modern Universe - was: The lists are closing


PICK is LEGACY Technology and does NOT Support alot of advanced
level computing we have today. I belive PICK is Similiar to Legacy DB2
that used ISAM type of DataBases Access. Even IBM has moved DB2 (Now
UDB)
to a completly relational architecture.
 
I belive some of the below are good reasons to Migrate to 
MainStream (Top 3 - DB2/Oracle/MSSQL etc) Databases.
 
1. UV has Little/NO support for Emerging
Technologies(XML/XQuery/XSLT/WML etc)

2. UV is Not supported in Most Integration Enterprise Software
(SAP/PeopleSoft)

3. UV is Not efficient compared to highly evolved databases(DB2/Oracle)

4. UV Folks seem to use PICK, which is Not Compatible with many of of
the Current Advanced Technologies and Techniques. 

5. UV is very SLOW, TOO Procedural and Not the right tool for an OLTP
Environment.
        
It would be nice if IBM provided a Package to convert all UV Stuff to
IBM DB2 and perhaps provide some kinda code converter to convert
all pick stuff to DB2 Stored Procs or Java Native Compiled Procedures.
I belive this would be ideal and would help corportations intergrate
systems easily.
 
Joe Eugene
 

 
________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Phil Walker
Sent: Sun 3/28/2004 7:59 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: The lists are closing



David,

As the list is closing this is probably not off topic - so I will
comment.

I believe PICK has been around since the mid to late 1960's, whereas
Oracle
and the SQL relation model has been around only since the mid to late
1970's
early 1980's if you are talking about Oracle etc.

I may be wrong.

Phil Walker
+64 21 336294
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
infocusp limited
\\ PO Box 77032, Auckland New Zealand \ www.infocusp.co.nz
DISCLAIMER:  This electronic message together with any attachments is
confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy,
disclose
or use the contents in any way. Please also advise us by return e-mail
that
you have received the message and then please destroy. infocusp limited
is
not responsible for any changes made to this message and / or any
attachments after sending by infocusp limited. We use virus scanning
software but exclude all liability for viruses or anything similar in
this
email or any attachment

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:36 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: The lists are closing

Best of luck Jeff, however I will point out the obvious, what is your
definition of modern? I would have thought the good old "relational
databases" have been around since before pick anyway? 8-)

Regards

David Logan
Database Administrator
HP Managed Services
139 Frome Street,
Adelaide 5000
Australia

+61 8 8408 4273
+61 417 268 665



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jeff Ritchie
Sent: Monday, 29 March 2004 8:03 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: The lists are closing


Thanks for the memories Cliff :)

Sorry to hear the lists are closing, but what the heck time and tide,
work committments etc.

As some one who is shortly to be ex mv, and moving into the more modern
technologies l will decline the offer to join, but wish the site all the
best.

Cheers,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Moderator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 27 March 2004 7:14 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The lists are closing


Dear Friends:

After 10+ years of either hosting or supporting the info-prime,
info-unidata, info-vmark, info-informix, and u2-users etc lists, I have
decided to shut down the list server.

u2-users and u2-community will cease to exist as of 1 April 2004. IBM is

officially supporting the efforts of the new U2UG.org group. (Yes. I am
a member of the establishing Board of that group. So this is not a
"coup" or Sour Grapes!) If you check out the forums that have been set
up, I think you will will see that they cover everything anyone has
asked for over the years in this group.

I *really* want to encourage ALL of you to come over the the
www.u2ug.org site and support this effort. This is *exactly* what many
of you on this list have wanted over the years. If Not Now, When?

Almost ten years on my Watch. How many years before that on Mike
O'Rear's Watch? In the Net World, this has been a Hell of a good run. (I

just couldn't resist tripping the Net Nanny filters one last time <very
evil grin>)

I'll see all of you on the other media, ok?

--

Regards,

Clif

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER & ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678    Web: www.oliver.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to