>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 9:49 AM
>Well I think that's going to depend on the application. >In an application where some users need read-only access to a few databases, >AND where they are not doing mass updates then it could be fine. I agree. But thats not clustering then is it? >If a users >says "show me the on-hand quanties for part xxx-yy" and it doesn't matter if it >takes a second or two to come up, then UV Net or any other similar product >would be fine. I suppose that depends on the response time expectations of your users. The last time I worked on an project which attempted to utilized UvNet (disclaimer: this was several years ago, perhaps performance has improved recently)it was unsuitable for interactive applications (i.e. freaking slow). YMMV >However if that same user wants to update every sales order with (empty) tax >to a sales order with zero tax, and you have one million past sales orders ... >then you might have a problem. >Will -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
