Can you remind me the termination rate fee the originating carrier receives for these "ported" redirections to the new carrier?
Christian Neil J. McRae wrote: > You can't just "fix" this without addressing other issues in the PSTN > architecture. > > Neil > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 12 Jun 2013, at 18:41, "Christian de Larrinaga" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The spineless attitude in Ofcom to porting is seriously inadequate in my >> humble opinion. >> >> There should be a national porting service that ENUM like would manage >> the routing without having to ingress into a legacy supply chain. >> >> Other countries manage it. >> >> >> Christian >> >> Nigel Titley wrote: >>> On 12/06/2013 14:34, Gavin Henry wrote: >>>>>> The ITSPA members list is a good place to start >>>>>> http://www.itspa.org.uk/members.shtml Some people on here are more >>>>>> wholesale. >>>> Hi Nigel, >>>> >>>> Also check out those with the QMA symbol as that will shorten your list. >>>> >>>> Some things to check before moving away: >>>> >>>> 1. Your phone numbers; will you be porting them away? >>> It would be less hassle than informing several thousand customers... so yes >>>> 2. If yes, were they ported to Gradwell or are they brand new? >>> They were brand new and assigned to to us by Gradwell >>>> 3. If new, then the Ofcom range holder is probably Telephony Services >>>> which means legally when you move away the calls still come into >>>> Telephony Services/Gradwell/AQL and then bounce back out with a >>>> special prefix for the new provider. That's how porting works. >>> Hmm.... >>>> Therefore, if they have network issues or downtime in the core then >>>> the calls won't get sent back out to the new provider even though >>>> you've moved on. >>> That's more than a little annoying... but I can see why it would be the >>> case. >>> >>> Thanks for the information >>> >>> Nigel >> > >
