From: "Michael Everson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At 22:37 +0100 2004-01-03, Philippe Verdy wrote: > > >Note that a fundamental property of character identity is its most common > >classification as a vowel, consonnant, or semi-vowel. > > That isn't true. The letter "v" is a vowel in Cherokee, a consonant > in Czech, and (often) a semivowel in Danish.
Stop arguing against each of my words. And READ: Is said "most common" on purpose above. Once again you are volontarily interpreting things that I did not say just to find a way to contradict me. I feel now that you have your own reading of the Unicode standard. But stop saying always that your position is neutral, objective. Accept that you can have a partial position that corresponds to your own needs and expectations of Unicode. You have the right to think that the representative glyphs are not representative at all. I think the opposite. You may not like these glyphs, because you, as a typographic expert, would have designed them differently. I really think that you are unable to accept any words that you have not said yourself, and you accept no compromize and prefer a systematic and, once again, dogmatic positions as THE only allowed and omnipotent expert for all questions regarding Unicode. I have never seen you accepting compromizes and I doubt of your negociation faculties. I must be extremely hard to negociate with you in the UTC meetings... Now reread what I said and you'll see that there was absolutely no intent to confuse any one, as I was clear about my intent by using enough moderating words. Thanks.
