On 03/01/2004 13:37, Philippe Verdy wrote:
...It's not a mirrored J, ...
We can't say from the exhibited uppercase alphabet that this should be a mirrored dotless j or a mirrored soft-dotted j if it is converted to lowercase. So Peter, where did you find this image of an alphabet?
The best description I can find of this character's glyph is that it is an inverted (not rotated) U+0490/0491 (not to be confused with U+0413/0433).
-- Peter Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) http://www.qaya.org/
