JackOfAll wrote: > My gut feeling is that whatever I'm doing and how I'm doing it, isn't > likely to satisfy you if it doesn't provide the outcome you would like. > I'm more than happy for you to dismiss what I have said as being > unscientific. That's fine. It's also fine if others wish to decide I > don't have a clue. That's their prerogative. And rather than crapping > all over Steen's thread, we should leave it there.
This is your response when anyone has questioned anything like this by you. I shouldn't have to ask so many questions to get answers from you about a simple test. All I wanted to know was your full test. Providing hints along the way every time I ask is not the way to offer conclusive proof of anything. Personally I couldn't care less, I don't use it, but trying to get answers out of you about your testing methodology is like pulling teeth. Software used, hardware used, discs/input used and expected/actual output could've been written in one post but you dragged it out. So yes, apologies Steen, feel free to delete these posts. 'last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/probedb) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ probedb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7825 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97803 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
