-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kevin Hunter wrote: > Oh gosh. No offense intended, but I much prefer the producingoss text > over the two blogs in question. The former is a cohesive and > well-reasoned rhetoric for entire-process openness, while the latter two > are more passive-aggressive and whiny. >
One of them was my blog :) > Like it or not, this *is* open source software, meaning that however the > primary developers want to do it is how it will be done. Whining But its /not/ open source. Not right now anyway. The source is closed, hence the thread. > doesn't help, and, in fact, usually hinders the process. Open source is > as much about the community as it is the final product. > Understand the circumstances here. Aside from myself and Scott there is, to my knowledge, one other person with code upstream. This isn't a typical case of "community." Part of that is due to problems like this. - --CJD -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkn6CTgACgkQIHOkVH4pLz7+fACcChzIRLRd82Zr4yaXolpEjvwh LFYAn0pXXa5HFJ+FaE55NeWvYImrAmHe =IKGx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- upstart-devel mailing list upstart-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
