Geoff Canyon wrote: > I wasn't sure what people were talking about with lock screen > performance issues, so I did a simple test ... > ...and found that in 6.7.3 that change increased the duration to about > 1.25 seconds -- a performance hit of about 30x just because a locked- > screen button is actually moving. In 9.0.1, the time changed to about > 0.35 seconds. So if the button *isn't* moving, 6.7.3 is much faster, > but in the more practical and likely case that the button *is* moving, > 9.0.1 is faster. So ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
That seems a good balance of priorities by use case. After all, when nothing's moving the wait time may not even be noticeable, but with moving objects performance can be critical.
-- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web ____________________________________________________________________ ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
