hi Chris,

Not sure what kind of help you need for next step. I would love to help if I
can.

--
Regards,
Michael Xu (xudong)
www.wizitsoft.com


On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Michael Xu (xudong)
<[email protected]>wrote:

> hi Chris,
>
> I think account and permission management are enough for framework and
> party/organization probably should not be in the scope of framework.
>
> Using LDAP is definitely a good idea. But I think that should be only a
> option, because not all customers have LDAP.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Michael Xu (xudong)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Christopher Snow <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Does the framework just need user account and permission management? or,
>> does it need party/organisation management too?
>>
>> Perhaps even using an external framework like ldap would be better for
>> managing the organisational structures, user accounts and permissions?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:
>> > hi Chris,
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > For me, I need user, organization, role, permission functionalities from
>> > party management. But I think you are right that maybe we need a more
>> > elegant party management from framework perspective. Or maybe we even
>> don't
>> > need party in the framework. (Just like JIRA did. JIRA implemented its
>> own
>> > user/permission/role)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > Michael Xu (xudong)
>> > www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86) 135
>> 0135
>> > 9807 | Fax: (8610) 62670096
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Christopher Snow <
>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Hi Michael,
>> >>
>> >> The problem with putting in the Party component is that it will throw
>> up
>> >> errors due to dependencies on other components.  (Try it and see!)
>> >>
>> >> It is likely that a new component will be required (i.e. developed) for
>> >> a standalone framework that has basic user account management
>> >> functionality.
>> >>
>> >> What party management functionality would you want to see in the
>> >> standalone framework?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> Chris
>> >>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to