On Dec 10, 2009, at 9:53 AM, Christopher Snow wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Does the framework just need user account and permission management? or, > does it need party/organisation management too?
The framework just needs user/security; parties, persons and organizations cannot be referenced by the framework level components. Jacopo > > Perhaps even using an external framework like ldap would be better for > managing the organisational structures, user accounts and permissions? > > Cheers, > > Chris > > Michael Xu (xudong) wrote: >> hi Chris, >> >> Thanks. >> >> For me, I need user, organization, role, permission functionalities from >> party management. But I think you are right that maybe we need a more >> elegant party management from framework perspective. Or maybe we even don't >> need party in the framework. (Just like JIRA did. JIRA implemented its own >> user/permission/role) >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Michael Xu (xudong) >> www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86) 135 0135 >> 9807 | Fax: (8610) 62670096 >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Christopher Snow < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> The problem with putting in the Party component is that it will throw up >>> errors due to dependencies on other components. (Try it and see!) >>> >>> It is likely that a new component will be required (i.e. developed) for >>> a standalone framework that has basic user account management >>> functionality. >>> >>> What party management functionality would you want to see in the >>> standalone framework? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Chris >>>
