Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
I have not heard much about a scenario for the database, does anyone
have any ideas on this or comments on what I have proposed so far.
    

I'm not sure I'd call "Plato Total Health Systems" a small company,
given the complexity of their business processes, as I understand them.
(But hey, what do I know how businesses really look like from the inner? :)
  
Trust me on this, it is not very complicated at all as compared to real, real world business.
What I, ehm, wanted to say with this: I'm not sure this scenario isn't
too complex already. While it might be realistic, I'm not sure that all
bells and whistles of the current scenario are useful for explaining
something to the user. That is, if we can't use a certain piece of the
business process particle of this company to answer at least one common
"How can I do ..."-question in Base, then should we really introduce
this particle to the scenario? Not sure.
  
I agree pretty much..in fact I figured that what would happen is that only a particluar piece would be implemented to any large degree, Contact management say, or order entry.

The next scenario I had in mind was for Queen City Supply. Even though this ficticious company might be larger then Plate how Base would fit into might be a better fit. Here is what the user on the forum was looking at. They have business systems in place already - multi-user and all that. However, the current route drivers ( they deliver consumables to local businesses [ paper bags, napkins, etc..] use paper based forms when they make their deliveries. Product is left at the customer site as needed, so when the drivers return the paper trial is turned in. The next day someone has to hand enter all the data into the current system and genrerate invoices and the like.

The idea here was to user OO.o on laptops. The Base database would just be used to generate invoices at the time the delivery is made. Later when the drivers return the laptops would be docked into the network and the data from each merged into the main systems.

It is a fairly concise use of Base.
For instance, I'm not sure about the actual benefit of the external web
hosting company.
  
Ah, that just a rouse to allow me to interject a daily import file, and show off how to use the HSQL text table feature.
Also, I think I already touched this somewhere: Do we want to have a
single database file, or a bunch of files which comprise the whole
"business intelligence application"? I tend to the former, but again
might not have enough insights into real-world usage scenarios to know
whether this is sufficient. Do others here have opinions?
  
Honestly I don't know how we are going to get away from needing ancilary files. I do have a few ideas on how to handle that, after all it is a database...we can have our own config tables and these can have columns of type varbinary, so we can bring our files along with the database. There is no reason why the database library can't use the API methods to create its own directory under the users lcoal directory. Once this is done the files can be moved from the database to the file system, this allows us to construct a path to them at runtime.

So far I have only tested this with graphics files, for use in controls. The transfer code is rather crude, but the concept works. At runtime the on load event for the form simply calls a function the checks for controls with graphic file methods and if there is an entry it fixes up the path information to match the currnent users installation.

I have not tried this with writer and calc templates yet, but I can' see why it shouldn't work.

On the other hand this might be too much for the demo, but I would still thin it worthwhile..even if we don't make a big part of the help file explanations.

The bottom line for me is this - If we don't want any graphics on forms fine...but reporting is problamatic..this is a big issue to users and the wizard just isn't going to take us very far. I suppose the other way to go would be to completely generate any words or calc files via code - but it would be so much easier using templates.

Not too mention...using templates and user defined variables in the templates I have an idea for a good way to allow the users to customize the reports and still have the applications basic procedures generate their custom reports. It will be limited, mostly playing with the appearance of the report but I think it would be a really nice thing to show.

LOL...maybe I am over reaching here...let me know.


Drew


Reply via email to