I would have mentioned Asciidoctor, had I believed that it was related to the problem. Besides, the Doxia version in the 'generator' tag is Doxia-related and so is the 'date' one. So, it came as somewhat of a surprise that Asciidoctor, while not messing with the former, overrules the setting for the latter, because it has its own timestamp setting. That it has it makes sense, because it is also a stand-alone docs generator with Doxia out of the picture. That setting just happens to write the identical tag. It was hard to diagnose, so it took me a while.
Do you think, you can do something about making the Doxia version or the whole 'generator' tag optional? Regards -- Alexander Kriegisch https://scrum-master.de Michael Osipov schrieb am 08.03.2024 um 20:48: > On 2024/03/07 10:24:07 Alexander Kriegisch wrote: >> Thanks, Michael, >> >> for challenging my problem description and asking for a reproducer. When >> trying to reproduce in a green-field project, skipGenerationDate=true >> was actually enough to suppress the timestamp meta tag on pages in >> default formats. As soon, however, as HTML pages generated from asciidoc >> sources using asciidoctor-maven-plugin come into play, the pages will >> contain timestamps. I think, I will investigate further in that >> direction about why that happens and whether it can be suppressed. > > You should have mentioned Asciidoctor much much earlier then I would have > told you that it completely circumvents the Doxia Sink API and does its own > thing with direct passthrough. Therefore, the output is out of our control. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
