On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:31:28 -0700 Came this utterance fomulated by David Lowe to my mailbox:
> On Oct 15, 2008, at 14:42 , jonathon wrote: > > >> There are obviously still a large number of dictionaries still not > >> converted to this new format. > > > > Also remember to include the dictionaries that were released, but > > never made it into the official OOo dictionary list. (At least one > > set looks like it won't be migratable to extension format.) > > > This is exactly where i'm coming from. Even if the OOo team > covers > 100% of all national and ethnic languages, there are still gobs of > dictionaries for scientific/academic/whatever use that apparently > aren't being converted for use by OOo 3.0. Many of them have been > created and released 'into the wild' as freeware .dic files, but the > creator can't or won't take the time to publish them in the new > format. I guess the take home message from this is that if you need > to use a certain dictionary [chemistry, for example] to write your > paper, then you need to find another word processor. > Hell no, the message as always has been pro-active. Help thyself and ask if you cannot do it alone. You will learn in the process and gain kudo's along the way. -- Michael All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well - Julian of Norwich 1342 - 1416 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
