LuKreme wrote: On 14-Dec-2009, at 07:59, Bill Landry wrote:Christian Brel, AKA "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" (among other aliases), is back…Ah, that explains the tone and typo pattern of that email.While I am suspicious of emailreg.org and Barracuda's ties to each other I am not moving to a shack in Montana because of it, if you know what I mean. Personally, I am not going to waste the processor cycles checking emailreg AT ALL, so I am not going to score up emails on the whitelist either. Now, if other more … levelheaded users of this list find that a slight positive nudge is worthwhile I'm certainly willing to reconsider. Thirty points in one rule? Do I look like I'm wearing a tinfoil hat? DARK FORCES indeed. If you think about it, if Barracuda, a spam filtering company, started selling access to spammers, how long do you think Barracuda would stay in business. Their customers who got the spam would move elsewhere. So I really don't think that Barracuda is going to sell out their main business to make $20 off of a few spammers. |
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list Christian Brel
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list Bill Landry
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list LuKreme
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list Marc Perkel
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list Christian Brel
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white ... Daniel J McDonald
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white ... Christian Brel
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list jdow
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white ... Rob McEwen
- RE: emailreg.org - tainted wh... Michael Hutchinson
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org... Charles Gregory
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org... Bob O'Brien
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org... Charles Gregory
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org... Martin Gregorie