While I'd like to see 2.3 out, I think that the attention to testing
is really important and shouldn't be rushed. Even non-code aspects
such as getting the cwiki documentation all lined up and the obsolete
stuff removed is important.

Isn't the vote on graduation due later this month?  If so,  I think
that doing an extra week or two of cleaning/polishing might be worth
it in terms of looking good to the community. And then if the release
is post-graduation kevan's comments apply and 2.3 will look more like
a really solid product.

That's my 2¢


On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Aaron Peeler <fapee...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
> I like the idea of having a post graduation release, but also would
> like to get 2.3 out.
> I would support either decision in how the community wants to go.
> Aaron
>> At this point, we may want to consider a 2.3 release post-graduation. There 
>> are some advantages for this. There will be some desires for a 
>> non-incubating release (no incubator in the name, no incubator disclaimer, 
>> etc).
>> --kevan

Reply via email to