While I'd like to see 2.3 out, I think that the attention to testing is really important and shouldn't be rushed. Even non-code aspects such as getting the cwiki documentation all lined up and the obsolete stuff removed is important.
Isn't the vote on graduation due later this month? If so, I think that doing an extra week or two of cleaning/polishing might be worth it in terms of looking good to the community. And then if the release is post-graduation kevan's comments apply and 2.3 will look more like a really solid product. That's my 2¢ --henry On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Aaron Peeler <fapee...@ncsu.edu> wrote: > I like the idea of having a post graduation release, but also would > like to get 2.3 out. > > I would support either decision in how the community wants to go. > > Aaron > >> >> At this point, we may want to consider a 2.3 release post-graduation. There >> are some advantages for this. There will be some desires for a >> non-incubating release (no incubator in the name, no incubator disclaimer, >> etc). >> >> --kevan
