That makes sense to me, too. Aaron C
On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Mark Gardner wrote: > Given the need to move the svn, website, etc. I prefer to go with > Aaron's suggestion. Let's get the release out and then concentrate on > moving things. > > Mark > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Aaron Peeler <aaron_pee...@ncsu.edu> wrote: >> ok right, since it will take time to move the svn, website, etc. >> >> I would like to push to get 2.3 out before graduation and then target >> a minor release (2.3.1) post graduation in August time frame. >> >> What do others think? >> >> Aaron >> >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 12, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Josh Thompson wrote: >>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> It sounds like the general consensus is that it would be okay to wait until >>>> after the board votes on our graduation before releasing 2.3 as long as >>>> there >>>> is little delay after the board vote. >>>> >>>> Mentors - Do you know if we can start a vote before the board meeting and >>>> close it afterward? The idea here being not to wait another 72 hours after >>>> the board meeting to get the release out. I know for me, it would be nice >>>> to >>>> get it out by the end of next week. I'll be on vacation the last week of >>>> June >>>> and would prefer not to work on cutting the release during that time. >>> >>> Hmm. I'm not sure that would be possible… A PMC votes on (and is >>> responsible for) releases. Before graduation, the PMC is the Incubator PMC. >>> Afterwards it's the VCL PMC. BTW, there are legal reasons why releases are >>> operations of a PMC. Seems simpler to wait and release as a true PMC. But >>> you can check with the IPMC/Board to see if it would be feasible… >>> >>> BTW, note that there will be some time required to move the mailing lists, >>> web site, etc… svn moves, also… >>> >>> --kevan >> >> >> >> -- >> Aaron Peeler >> Program Manager >> Virtual Computing Lab >> NC State University >> >> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which >> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public >> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. > > > > -- > Mark Gardner > --
