Thursday, February 27, 2003, 1:48:29 PM, pero wrote:

>> does that mean there's no lead in the velocity project?
>> or is nobody of the contributors interested in further development?
>
> The only one that has been interested was Geir, but he "disappeared"
> some time ago and so the project is indeed with no lead. The community
> has been willing to contribute and to develop velocity (a *lot* of
> things could / need to be done!) - but...

Guys, why don't you report the problem to the Apache leaders? Maybe it
is a stupid idea of mine... but really, AFAIK Apache has their rules
that Opens Source project must have a minimal number of contributors,
for very good reasons: badly maintained software spoils the trust in
Open Source; an organization like ASF can't ensure proper maintenance
for an approved and well-known project? I'm watching the Vel. list for a
long time, also I was Vel users earlier, and I have to say that the
*core* Vel. project (I mean, not the sub-project as Tools) -- aside of
interesting technical discussions where the result was never actually
implemented -- is dead in practice for long time. Why, why why? Geir has
no time? Or the code is tangled and nobody dears to start to hack it? Or
what?

-- 
Best regards,
 Daniel Dekany



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to