Tim said: > > So let's do it. This is a level of coding that even I can bite off if > > folks agree it's the Right Thing To Do. (I figure it isn't much more > > than moving a little code and re-writing some docs.) > > > > Thoughts? > Answering myself... ugh. > > This would break all many existing web applications.
including some of the current examples for velocity proper, which would then have to be dropped or moved to velocity-tools. not necessarily a bad thing though... > So - it would have to involved a RELEASE of velocity-tools.jar and > should probably go into the 1.5 version with big warning labels... these things would likely be a minimum prerequisite. so, yeah, don't hold your breath. it might be a while, if it happens at all. it's good in theory, but good theory needs to be tempered by practical sensibilities. (a line which i might also apply to the float-support debate et. al.) Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
