On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 03:47 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Bill said:Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:...On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 12:58 AM, Tim Colson wrote:To be make sure I'm clear: the modified proposal is to copy theWell, I guess what I was thinking was to *not* just move it, but start
VelocityServlet code to Tools, opt. deprecate the core copy of
VelocityServlet, incorporate the Servlet section in the Velocity Main
Dev Guide into the Tools Dev guide, and have the Main docs simply point
to this new location?
again - try to combine best practices in making something more useful
for real life. I have stopped using the VelocityServlet because it
doesn't do much for me in my real life.As a first step we could make it so VelocityViewServlet doesn't require
subsclassing VelocityServlet and is resource based so it can be run from
within a WAR with zero configuration.
+1
this also has the benefit of further freeing up the Velocity-Tools subproject from Velocity's release cycle.
let's let VelocityServlet fall back to just being useful for examples and
pointing folks toward the Tools project.
*exactly*
Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-956-2604(w) Adeptra, Inc. 203-434-2093(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 203-247-1713(m)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
