Bill said: > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 12:58 AM, Tim Colson wrote: > >> To be make sure I'm clear: the modified proposal is to copy the > >> VelocityServlet code to Tools, opt. deprecate the core copy of > >> VelocityServlet, incorporate the Servlet section in the Velocity Main > >> Dev Guide into the Tools Dev guide, and have the Main docs simply point > >> to this new location? > >> > > Well, I guess what I was thinking was to *not* just move it, but start > > again - try to combine best practices in making something more useful > > for real life. I have stopped using the VelocityServlet because it > > doesn't do much for me in my real life. ... > As a first step we could make it so VelocityViewServlet doesn't require > subsclassing VelocityServlet and is resource based so it can be run from > within a WAR with zero configuration.
+1 this also has the benefit of further freeing up the Velocity-Tools subproject from Velocity's release cycle. let's let VelocityServlet fall back to just being useful for examples and pointing folks toward the Tools project. Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
