Hi Vincent, Unfortunately that isn't the response I was hoping for. Depending on my colleagues decision I will now most probably move to Cornerstome. This is really such a shame. One would expect at least a estimate timeframe could be agreed upon...
Too bad, really, but my patience has run out. Kind regards, Marijn On Nov 2, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Vincent Robbesom wrote: > > Hey guys! > > At this moment there is being worked on the bug reports of Versions. > The screens, the memory issues and a dozen other things to do... > However, Since this is not our only product, we don't have any exact > timeframe yet. > However we do realize the urge for improvement. No way versions get > snowed in but things cost time and effort… > > Keep posting on the support site an please be patient. > > Kind regards, > Vincent > > On Nov 2, 5:49 am, TheDO <[email protected]> wrote: >> I wholeheartedly agree with you. I've personally recommended Versions >> a few times to my colleagues, and now I feel embarrassed because of >> the sluggish updates to Versions. I, along with several others, >> continue pushing the Sofa team to speed up development, but I >> personally fear that means version 2.0, which will require a new >> license. I've been waiting several months for some minor improvements >> to Versions. The latest version even introduced some new issues that >> interfere with my workflow (ie. the sheet that stays on the screen >> when switching apps). I completely empathize with the challenges >> involved in software development, but when I also observe some teams >> keeping a nice pace with updates to their products, so I know it can >> be done. Let's see Versions jump to the front of the pack and get >> into >> the headlines again. It has amazing potential for really raising the >> bar on the Mac. >> >> /TheDO/ >> >> On Oct 30, 9:34 am, Marijn Huizendveld <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi guys, >> >>> I really hate to ask this question again but I feel I have to. Is a >>> new significant release to be expected anytime soon? >> >>> The reason why I'm asking is I finally convinced some freelance >>> colleagues of mine to start using SVN. Now they need to buy a >>> client >>> and at the moment I can't really say I'd recommend Versions over >>> Conerstone... The current state makes me consider moving over to >>> cornerstone, I can pitch in with their group license anyway so it >>> won't be that expensive. That's really a pity, I've been using it >>> since the one of the first public betas. >>> I do feel bad about it because I really would like to support a >>> product from my hometown and I really admire the products of Sofa >>> but >>> that simply can't be the winning argument. >> >>> Please make me reconsider. >> >>> Kindest regards, >> >>> Marijn Huizendveld > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
