I have not voiced my opinion and will not, except
to say, WELL SAID, I could of not done better.
Tony   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Stephen DiCerbo wrote:

>
>
>
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> > These fish have a 2 year life cycle, at the
>> > end of which they spawn and then die, so who
>> > cares if they get snagged.  Supposedly
>> > delicious smoked... :-)
>>
>      I care ......
>
>         so do many others........      Having
> been involved with ten years of battle to get
> New York State to remove  legalized  snagging
> from the sport fishing regulations, I have seen
> the damage that setting a precedent like this
> can do.....
>
>      Don't get me wrong.....   I have no  qualms
> whatsoever about utilizing a resource.....
> whether they will die or not is not an issue,
> really.....    It becomes a question of ethics
> and a "fisherman's" system of  values....
>
>     I  draw the line thusly:  in order for a
> fish procurement method to be considered
> "sport"  it must involved the enticement of
> fish to strike or eat or consume  the offering.
> If  not, it is not sport fishing.
>
>    The best way for me to describe  snagging  is
> Harvesting, not fishing....  (incidentally, in
> the area in question, they used to use pitch
> forks to collect the "they just gonna die
> salmon")....   gill netting, purse netting, and
> fish traps and the like  are not considered
> sport fishing either...  they are commercial
> fishing techniques and harvesting methods.
>
>     again, I have no issue with the harvesting
> of a resource (managed of course)  at all.  But
> call a spade a spade.
>
> When the state of New York (and some other
> states, from my understanding)  set up
> regulations for the harvesting of fish by
> snagging under the guise of sport fishing, they
> created a monster......
>
>    Although we have finally gotten  the
> "legalized" stipulation for snagging off the
> books, the damage has been done...  two
> generations worth.....    the practice is still
> pursued, and we have at least two generations of
> what could have been ethical fishermen who  have
> been taught by their fathers that ripping a
> weighted hook (or whatever device the current
> regulations will allow them to get away with
> using) with a jerking motion,  into the bodies
> of fish , and  dragging  them upon shore in
> disgrace  is what constitutes the sport and
> ethical enjoyment of fishing....
>
>    This practice and lack of ethical fishing not
> only spread across generations of fisherman in
> the state (and neighboring states who came to
> partake),  but across the species and across the
> water systems....
>
>    These so called fishermen now deploy these
> harvesting methods indiscriminately to
> steelhead, trout, walleyes, any species , and do
> so in any body of water and in any situation.
>
>    It has been one of the most  negative impacts
> to sport fishing in recent history.
>
>   so, you see  ,   I care.    They are delicious
> smoked,  but some carry the bitter aftertaste
> of this behavior  called snagging.
>
>
>     Merry  Christmas to all and to all a good
> night.
>
>
> Splinta'

Reply via email to