Because I think the "general discussion" of the Yahoo Group is too
much and the group is not very inviting new members or non-vloggers.

It is my opinion that forums should be broken down into sub-topics so
that users can pay attention to the things they are interested in (or
understand).

As for linking to Yahoo (and others), I'm hoping to build out a
complete "video blogging handbook".  Any registered user can create a
new pages, yet not a single user has tried.

The amount of work it took to get the new site up combined by the lack
of community support has taken its toll on my motivation.  I have
hopes of building many more tools/features, but we'll see.

Again, I'm not sure how to gear the site toward the 80% non-vloggers
yet satisfy the 20% of vloggers (who VlogMap relies on for content).

-Matt


--- In [email protected], "Andreas Haugstrup"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 09 May 2006 18:32:35 +0200, LeanBackVids.com 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There are many topics here that would benefit people outside the
> > group, but it does not have enough exposure.  Search 'vlog', 'vlogs',
> > 'video blog' or 'video blogs' and the Yahoo Group does not come up.
> >
> > <start plug here>
> >
> > VlogMap gets a shit load of traffic from search engines and
> > international media articles.  Most of the visitors are visiting to
> > watch vlogs or find out more about vlogging.
>
> Why don't you link to the Yahoo group then? :o)
>
> --
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
>





SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant Individual Use
Explains


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to