The Wikipedia page for Web syndication mentions licensing, but
contrasts it with "web feeds". 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_syndication


--- In [email protected], Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> hmmm.  what kind of *syndication* does that refer to?
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syndication
> 
> i notice that the *implication* is that most are *paid*
> 
> 
> On Dec 14, 2006, at 4:25 PM, leanbackvids wrote:
> 
> > This eventually leads us to the question of RSS usage...
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS_%28file_format%29#Usage
> >
> >  RSS is short for Really Simple *Syndication*.
> >
> >  When we publish our RSS files publicly, it is implied that we
> >  authorize the syndicating of our content.
> >
> >  At that point, I think there is very little control over
who/where/how
> >  your content is actually syndicated.
> >
> >  The whole point is to free content, not restrict it.
> >
> >  -Matt
> > http://vlogmap.org
> >
> >  --- In [email protected], Markus Sandy <markus.sandy@>
> >  wrote:
> >  >
> >  > i think i see a difference
> >  >
> >  > aren't fireant and mefeedia "opt-in" ?
> >  >
> >  > also, i don't think they *feature* sites from people who wish 
> > otherwise
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > On Dec 14, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Heath wrote:
> >  >
> >  > > I don't see what you are doing as any different than Fireant, or
> >  > > MeFeedia, etc. You are providing a way to view video on the web,
> >  > > vlogs, etc.....at least you are providing link backs and other
> >  > > things, there are plenty of sites around that just "take" your 
> > feed
> >  > > and you would never know it. Ran across a few of those, now THAT
> >  > > bothers me, just taking, but I don't see what you are doing
> >  > > as "wrong"..... IMO you have been honest and above board, so no
> >  > > worries on my end..
> >  > >
> >
> 
> 
> ---
> Markus Sandy
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/havemoneywillvlog
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/apperceptions
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/digitaldojo
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/spinflow
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to